Activitism

NC Standing Up for Science

Last Friday, scientists from around the United States and France participated in the StandUp for Science rally. I wore my Albuquerque Isotopes jersey, celebrating the start of the baseball season and Triple A team for the Colorado Rockies, but mostly as a way to discuss the importance of isotopes and science in our daily lives. I’ve used isotopes in my hydrogeology career as explained in this IAEA fact sheet.

My friend Dave King joined me for the event in downtown Raleigh, North Carolina located on a grassy mall between NC General Assembly and state government education buildings. Abut 500 hundred people attended the peaceful rally with many joining from the big three universities: Duke, UNC, and NC State. Scientists are standing up, speaking out, and coming together from rival athletic programs. The majority of scientists appeared to represent medical students and researchers responding to NIH funding cuts. I met one of the local organizers, Noelle Muzzy, a toxicology fellow with EPA, shown here interviewed by WRAL news.

Some of the signs we saw people create include:

SCIENCE WILL SAVE YOUR LIFE - BUT ONLY IF FEDERAL RESEARCH FUNDING IS RESTORED FOR CANCER, INFECTIOUS DISEASES, ETC. (shown on cover photo)

PROTECT SCIENTIFIC FREEDOM

I’M ALIVE TODAY THANKS TO SCIENCE

THE EARTH IS NOT FLAT, VACCINES WORK, CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL, THOM TILLIS UP FOR REELECTION

REFORM NOT RECKLESSNESS

DISCOVERY NEEDS DOLLARS

NO FUNDING NO RESEARCH

BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE (with a picture of the Earth on fire)

THERE IS SOMETHING YOU CAN DO: MAKE NOISE, TAKE UP SPACE, HELP SOMEONE

SCIENCE MATTERS: Saves Lives, Develops Medicines, Improves Health Care, Reduces Egg Prices, Develops Energy Sources, Keeps Water and Air Clean, Makes Safer Cars, Ensures Healthy Food, Protects National Security, Promotes Strong Economy, Prevents Measles Flu and More, Slows Climate Change, Stimulates Creativity

SCIENCE NOT SILENCE

We spoke to several people who shared how vaccines or other medical treatments saved their lives. One person told me that she needed six surgeries and specialized antibiotics to heal her from gangrene infections. We met Anna Buckalew who recently retired from EPA saying that most of the current or displaced federal government workers could not attend the rally as they would not want to be seen going against the administration in hopes to preserve their federal careers. Here’s a report by WUNC who interviewed Anna and others.

I met a Duke University genetics researcher who said the $200 million cut in federal funding (mentioned in my previous blog) was designated for buildings and salaries and does not cover other incidental costs like lab reagents. Her work on viruses is being shut down!

One familiar voice I previously met was Emily Sutton, Executive Director of the Haw River Assembly, who’s sounding the alarm on toxic pollution in river and drinking water! We all need to do more outreach to address these issues. See more about her speech and others as reported by NC Newsline.

The Raleigh News&Observer recorded Nyssa Tucker, a PhD candidate at UNC-Chapel Hill, speaking at the rally.

After about six speeches, the organizers directed everyone to form a line and march around the buildings chanting:

“Out of Labs and Into the Streets”

When Science Is Under Attach What Do We Do? We Stand Up and Fight Back.”

“What Do We Want? Peer Review! When Do We Want It? Now!”

I’m grateful to all the participants for their activism and dedication to science which is making the world a better place for us all!

Science Walkout on March 7th

Stand Up For Science 2025 is a national day of action calling for robust, interference-free scientific research and policies that ensure science serves everyone. On Friday, March 7th, 2025, in Washington, DC, state capitals, and cities around the country, people will gather to advocate for continued government support for science, defend against censorship, and push back on attacks against diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in research and education.

Stand Up for Science is officially supporting rallies in Washington DC and 31 other cities around the country. This means that a confirmed site leader—backed by our core team—is actively organizing a public event with SUFS volunteers. 

If your city isn’t listed as a site of an official SUFS rally, you can still make your voice heard by joining the nationwide campus and workplace walkout at 12:00 PM local time on March 7th or adding your local event below.

How to Participate in a Walkout:

🚪 Walk out of your lab, classroom, or office at 12:00 noon.

👥 Gather with others in a visible location—campus quads, courtyards, or administrative buildings can be great options.

📢 Amplify your message. Bring a sign and consider inviting faculty, researchers, or students to briefly speak about why science matters. A megaphone or simple printed statements can make a big impact!

📸 Spread awareness. Post photos, videos, and key messages using #StandUpForScience to show solidarity nationwide.

Where I live, North Carolina will be particularly hard hit by cuts to science, given the large amount of tech and research in the Triangle: Duke University alone is facing a nearly $200 million annual reduction in National Institute of Health funding for research in critical areas including cancer, Alzheimer’s, infectious diseases, and pediatric health.

Here’s news from Nature that states, “As US federal grants remain frozen and budget cuts loom, anxiety and fear grip early-career researchers.”

This week as Texas is reeling from a preventable measles outbreak, the head of Health and Human Services (HHS) doesn’t believe in vaccines. The Texas Tribune reports, “Texas is facing its worst measles outbreak in decades, as cases have jumped from two to 146 in just one month. A child is dead, 20 more are hospitalized and the worst is likely still ahead, public health experts say, as Texas’ decreasing vaccination rates leave swaths of the state exposed to the most contagious virus humans currently face.” At the same time, HHS is shutting down vaccine support including for Covid and the flu according to The New Republic.

I’m capturing messages from distressed scientists posting on LinkedIn from many federal agency, university, and not-for-profit scientists. Prior to Trump 2.0, most of the posts that I read focused on job promoting and never was heard a discouraging word. Now that has drastically changed as scientists are losing their jobs, struggling to speak up, and possibly losing their careers. I’m shocked to hear from a colleague at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) who shared the five stages of grief which everyone in the agency is experiencing! NRC was an independent commission - an arm of Congress - until recently. See this article from a former NRC Chair.

We can look at any agency to see the turmoil being caused to our civil society and civil servants whose primary job is to protect public health, safety, and the environment. So what happens when they totally get rid of or gut Department of Education, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, EPA, NOAA, National Science Foundation, DOI, USAID, etc?

Here’s a blog that I wrote after the first march for science in 2017 showing the motivations by many scientists and positive results coming from that event.

Please share this announcement widely!

Diverse Neighbors

Neighbors are divided in supporting 2024 Presidential candidates including in this battleground state of North Carolina. The cover photo shows adjacent neighbor’s homes displaying signs for opposing parties in the affluent area across from Green Level High School.

Both Democratic and Republican candidates are calling this the most consequential election of our lifetimes and using civil-unrest rhetoric: one side says we need to ‘fight to win’ and another threatening to use the military against political rivals within the U.S. I hope and pray we can all reside in peace and harmony during and after this election!

This is the first year that I’ve taken an active role in political campaigns although I’ve posted a few earlier blogs shown below discussing the contrast between evolving parties and elected officials.

Canvassing for the Harris-Walz campaign, I’ve knocked on about 130 doors so far focusing on getting out the Democratic vote by making sure people know when and where to cast their ballot and recording responses on the phone app MiniVan.

When people are home and answer their door, which averages about half the time, I identify myself and ask if they have voted or have a plan to vote. Then I try to determine which candidates they support. I’ve heard the full spectrum of views from strongly supporting, strongly opposed, refusing to disclose, as well as one person intentionally not voting. I’m relieved to learn that most people encourage my efforts and over a dozen times I’ve gotten the opportunity to engage in informative, sometimes passionate, conversations lasting 15 minutes or more.

I’ve spoken with a few undecided voters who asked my opinion for which candidate and party would be better for “kitchen-table economics.” I empathize that it’s difficult getting unbiased news and that we need to make decisions based on our personal, moral and ethical views. We’re all concerned with the rise in food and housing prices during the pandemic. I like to mention how the U.S. economy is getting much better with inflation and interest rates coming down. But consumer prices are still too high. One candidate supports billionaires like Elon Musk to provide tax cuts or petrochemical companies wanting cuts in environmental regulations. I mention the contrast with the Biden administration, Federal Reserve, and Harris proposals as cited in the non-partisian Economist magazine (based in London) with articles including from October 17, 2024 titled: “The envy of the world, America’s economy is bigger and better than ever. Will politics bring it back to earth?”

One retired person I spoke with favored Mr. Trump because he wants to cut taxes. I said it might sound good on the surface but the last time he cut taxes in 2017 it favored the wealthiest people and international corporations, it significantly added to the deficit, and increased inflation. According to the Center for American Progress:

“The Center for American Progress is an independent, nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. An important body of evidence shows that the corporate tax changes in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act failed to produce promised investment or wage increases for the vast majority of U.S. workers. The law did, however, significantly reduce corporate tax collections, diverting resources from public investment to the pockets of wealthy shareholders, executives, and high-paid workers.”

If you dig deeper when Mr. Trump says he wants to cut taxes for overtime pay, social security, or medicare that means getting rid of those benefits or entitlements. The people who are currently working are paying the retiree recipients. October 21st news states Mr. Trump’s plan would eliminate Social Security by 2031 (U.S. News and World Report)! I also remind voters that House Republicans tried unsuccessfully 50 times when Trump was president to replace the Affordable Care Act which is much more popular than Obamacare (which are the same programs).

I’ve shared my personal and professional experiences after retiring as a federal government civil servant in 2019 and since began being able to speak out about politics.

Here are some other related blogs that show the contrast between the two parties:

1/21/2021 Diverse Unity

7/6/2020 Environmental Legacy of the 41st President (George H.W. Bush)

6/12/2020 Vote and Yell If You Can For America To Survive

7/21/2019 Carter Denounces Overconsumption

UPDATE: November 7, 2024

Knocking on about 400 doors and speaking with approximately 100 people in four upper middle class neighborhoods over the past few weeks revealed insights as to the election results for many of the candidates. The list on MiniVan provided by the Democratic Party provided names and addresses of people registered as Democrats with the goal of getting out the vote. We could tell voting status and did not need to ask people if they already voted during the early voting period.

Many voters I spoke with said they planned to vote for Democrats while surprisingly many were unhappy with the Biden-Harris administration and planned to vote for Trump-Vance. Some were not happy that Kamala Harris got the nomination for President after the primary election occurred which nominated Joe Biden without much contest except from Representative Dean Phillips from Minnesota who tried to warn people at that time. I felt that Harris was the likely successor being on the same ticket and there was not time to hold another primary election which would have fractured the party. It’s amazing the broad support across political ideologies that Harris quickly assembled and how many former Trump Administration officials spoke out against him.

Most voters that I spoke with were more concerned about cost of living rising over the past four years and showed frustration that more was not done by the government to help people. Many voters said the Republicans speaking out against Mr. Trump was because he fired them; perhaps his Apprentice show meme “Your fired” stuck with people. I attempted to counter these arguments with my own personal experiences.

When I asked their choice for North Carolina Governor, I did not hear anyone endorse Republican Lt. Governor Robinson but they did support Democrat Josh Stein, the former attorney general, who won election. Also the superintendent of public schools went to Democrat Mo Green who defeated a MAGA supporting Republican. So it was not a complete sweep for Republicans in North Carolina where Trump-Vance won by 51%.

I personally would have been willing to ring anyone’s doorbell that did not have an opposing candidate’s sign displayed. I’ve heard news commentators mention that we all need to engage and listen to differing viewpoints to have healthy conversations but both sides are living in a bubble. This is one reason that most Democrats lost elections with an unpopular, isolated incumbent President who many people feel wasn’t listening all the way down to the lowest levels of the campaign such as myself volunteering to canvas and only talking to those registered as Democrats but many of whom rebelled against the party.

May we hold true to our ideals and values, preserve our first Amendment and other freedoms, improve two-way conversations and courageously speak out against negative forces that try to separate our humanity and hard-fought protections such as for health, safety and the environment!

Schendler’s List for Corporate Sustainability

Auden Schendler shares compelling war (and peace) stories from the front lines of the sustainability movement separating corporate propaganda from real advancements. After reading his 2009 book, we shared some text messages and he says, “in short, if business doesn’t approach climate at scale, it’s not part of the solution.”

In the 2009 book, Getting Green Done: Hard Truths from the Front Lines of the Sustainability Revolution, he describes his influential role as sustainability manager for Aspen Skiing Company. Mr. Schendler points out that Aspen, Colorado is a mecca for the ultra-affluent, generating world-wide attention, so has a greater impact on corporate decisions. Aspen is also a poster child for the impacts of climate change where the winter season already lost a month due to early springtime just in the past few decades. The future of the ski industry (as well as the entire planet) is being jeopardized by global warming, aka. climate change.

More recently in 2013, Auden Schendler and co-author Michael Toffel provided a list of five actions needed for meaningful corporate sustainability programs:

1.       Lobby local, national and international political leaders to reduce carbon

2.      Insist trade groups give priority to climate policy

3.      Market climate activism

4.      Partner with effective non-governmental organizations

5.      Demand suppliers reduce greenhouse gas emissions

 

The First Earth Day Walk for Science

On Saturday April 22, we celebrated worldwide the first Walk for Science along with Earth Day that began in 1970. Ironically, the tremendous progress that scientists have made continues to be challenged for numerous reasons. To me getting scientists to emerge outside their comfort zone of the field, office or laboratory and be willing to publicly express their views is a tremendous leap in courage. What is causing scientists to emerge and unify their message?

Here in the small town of Grand Junction, Colorado we saw an estimated 750 people including doctors, paleontologists, ecologists and political scientists walk a few blocks to the city park and celebrate Earth Day. I've felt proud to choose a career in earth science to hopefully make improvements in our environment for current and future generations. I saw many people who've worked hard in school to get great educations and careers to make a difference. I also felt proud to see my son wear his Walk for Water tee shirt and be really interested in the people coming out to support science.

So that is what this first Walk for Science was all about: expressing the rights of scientific freedom to pursue the truth based on inquiry, evidence and peer review. How can we survive a pandemic without scientists developing effective vaccinations? How will we remove contamination from a water supply which could cause cancer if we fail to test and obtain the results? Protecting our air, food and water from natural and human events is a matter of national security. The climate is changing whether we like it or not and we better get moving on solutions rather than bury our heads in the sand! Most people are very grateful for our National Park system and the great natural environments that is such a treasure for Americans and tourist from around the world. Allowing nature to produce wildfires is beneficial to forest ecology as well as reintroducing predators like the wolf controls overpopulation of deer and elk that also benefits habitat for other species.

Despite current threats of funding cuts for scientists to perform unbiased work, I believe challenges to scientists and scientific evidence is not really a new fight with current politicians but rather the ongoing search for truth that has always been a struggle -- probably even before the seventeenth century time of Galileo. His evidence that the Earth was not in the center of our universe based on observation of planetary motion challenged conventional wisdom held by religious leaders. 

I heard speakers during the Walk for Science mention the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." 

I recall in high school being fascinated by the weather and how we could take simple measurements of barometric pressure to see if storms were coming when pressure dropped. This is before satellites and doppler radar revolutionized weather prediction including storms or droughts. Think for a moment how NASA, NOAA, USGS, and many other government scientists have benefited all of us for our food and water supplies! Why should our children be forced to return to primitive uncertainty?

One of the biggest changes occurring in science over the past couple of decades is the multidisciplinary collaboration required to solve complex, interrelated problems. Scientific education traditionally forces us into very narrow specialization with unique vocabularies. Luckily groups like the American Geophysical Union do a great job of promoting world-class science for all the disciplines to merge and became a big supporter of the Walk for Science. See the joint statement by over 25 scientific societies on the results of the Walk for Science.