The Climate Diet

I found The Climate Diet on the new book shelf at the public library. The author Paul Greenberg offers, “50 simple ways to trim your carbon footprint.” The small concise book is an easy and fun read with many practical ideas that are easy to implement. Many of these ideas are well known but it’s worth being reminded and during this COVID pandemic many people are being forced to change their habits by staying more at home, eating less meat and diary, buying energy efficient appliances and electric vehicles, riding bicycles, telecommuting, gardening and planting more trees.

Some of the ideas that I had not heard about include how much money banks fund the fossil fuels industry. JP Morgan Chase held the misdirected distinction of being the top money lender providing almost $270 billion from 2016-2019. The top four banks (Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi, and Banks of America) loaned about $811 billion to the industry that created and exacerbates the climate crisis. As consumers we make choices on our banks, credit cards, investments, and insurance. This reminds me of a blog I wrote almost six months ago on ESG.

Another useful idea for new construction or when the air conditioner needs to be replaced is to use a heat pump. The author adds a resource section including advice on heat pumps from NRDC.

Here is what the publisher says:

“ABOUT THE CLIMATE DIET

A celebrated writer on food and sustainability offers fifty straightforward, impactful rules for climate-friendly living

“Some strong and rational suggestions for reducing your personal impact here–and when you’re eating smart, you’ll have the energy to do the movement building we need to change systems too! This book integrates the individual and the societal in a powerful way.”–Bill McKibben


We all understand just how dire the circumstances facing our planet are and that we all need to do our part to stem the tide of climate change. When we look in the mirror, we can admit that we desperately need to go on a climate diet. But the task of cutting down our carbon emissions feels overwhelming and the discipline required hard to summon. With The Climate Diet, award-winning food and environmental writer Paul Greenberg offers us the practical, accessible guide we all need. It contains fifty achievable steps we can take to live our daily lives in a way that’s friendlier to the planet–from what we eat, how we live at home, how we travel, and how we lobby businesses and elected officials to do the right thing. Chock-full of simple yet revelatory guidance, The Climate Diet empowers us to cast aside feelings of helplessness and start making positive changes for the good of our planet.”

Going Solar

Today I applied to the Homeowners Association (HOA) to approve installing solar panels on our home. The process to choose installing solar has been much more challenging, although less expensive, than buying a PHEV car last year as I previously described in this blog. While I’ve bought many automobiles in the past, this is the first time choosing a solar company to purchase and install panels. With the new Inflation Reduction Act allowing for 30% tax rebates and declining costs of solar panels, the time for homeowners to install solar could never be better!

We purchased our home in February 2022. About a dozen neighbors out of a couple of hundred homes have installed solar panels so far. However, the HOA just took over the 5-year old community after the builder completed the development. Our next door neighbor, who needed to signoff on our request, was able to install panels on their rear south facing roof and some homes were “grandfathered” allowing them with panels facing the front of the house. The new HOA requirements do not allow panels to be visible from the front of the house which eliminates many homeowners from installing solar if the front of their home faces the south.

So we may be the first to test the new architectural review committee (ARC) process, which just this month added solar to the guidelines: “Solar Panels are allowed and should be installed by a licensed professional with the proper architectural application approval. Panels should be installed on the sides or back of the roof and not front street facing to appeal more to the overall look of the home.”

We are requesting the ARC to approve our plan for installing 18 panels on the west facing rear roof and 4 panels on the south facing roof. Our neighbor in charge of the ARC informally suggested we get the most efficient and install the fewest number of panels we can.

I spoke with several neighbors who’ve installed solar panels in our neighborhood by knocking on doors or checking the Facebook group learning they used at least four different companies. Before contacting companies I wanted to get better informed on the options so I found this book to be very helpful as an introduction:

How to Solar Power Your Home by Martha Maeda, 2015 Atlantic Publishing Group

The author describes motivations for going solar, active and passive systems, evaluating if solar is right for you depending on where you live, energy efficiency, designs and selecting components, rebates, and maintenance.

After reading the book and reviewing some helpful websites including energysage.com, solarreviews.com, solarpowertalk.com, and nuwattenergy.com, I compiled lists of solar providers, ratings, reviews, manufacturer technology, and costs. I then contacted companies on the top list and got estimates over the phone after providing our monthly electric usage.

I compared bids from six companies that proposed to install panels from several companies including AlphaPure, QCell, REC, Solaria, and SunPower. So it’s important to learn about the actual panel technology in addition to selecting the company to install the panels. Some of the installers were locally owned companies and some were national. I spoke with sales people from several other states and only one person wanted to meet in person. I looked at solar panel specs including efficiency, duration (panels lose power over time), cost per watt, and warrantees. Many of the installation companies were willing to share how they could beat the competition.

The process to select a solar company took me several weeks, it will take several more months to get the panels installed, and we probably won’t know for many years or perhaps decades if we made the right decisions so far. But we can feel good today that we are trying to make a difference in going green!

Fed Climate Actions

Today there were two historic actions by the U.S. Federal Government responding to the climate crisis: President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Department of Interior imposed new water restrictions on the Colorado River.

The IRA law according to the White House makes the largest investment in clean energy by:

Lowering Energy Costs

  • Families that take advantage of clean energy and electric vehicle tax credits will save more than $1,000 per year.

  • $14,000 in direct consumer rebates for families to buy heat pumps or other energy efficient home appliances, saving families at least $350 per year.

  • 7.5 million more families will be able install solar on their roofs with a 30% tax credit, saving families $9,000 over the life of the system or at least $300 per year.

  • Up to $7,500 in tax credits for new electric vehicles and $4,000 for used electric vehicles, helping families save $950 per year.

  • Putting America on track to meet President Biden’s climate goals, which will save every family an average of $500 per year on their energy costs.

Building a Clean Energy Economy

  • Power homes, businesses, and communities with much more clean energy by 2030, including:

    • 950 million solar panels

    • 120,000 wind turbines

    • 2,300 grid-scale battery plants

  • Advance cost-saving clean energy projects at rural electric cooperatives serving 42 million people.

  • Strengthen climate resilience and protect nearly 2 million acres of national forests.

  • Creating millions of good-paying jobs making clean energy in America.

Reducing Harmful Pollution

  • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 1 gigaton in 2030, or a billion metric tons – 10 times more climate impact than any other single piece of legislation ever enacted.

  • Deploy clean energy and reduce particle pollution from fossil fuels to avoid up to 3,900 premature deaths and up to 100,000 asthma attacks annually by 2030.

Federal water restrictions on the Colorado River are being imposed on seven Western states and Mexico. The crisis did not begin with current droughts and result largely from the original 1920’s compact that overestimated available water supplies.

Be Prepared!

David Pogue’s book How to Prepare for Climate Change: A Practical Guide to Surviving the Chaos compiles key resources for climate impacts and important steps we all need to take. With the help of 50 experts the book contains great advice on topics including where to live and invest, how to build and insure, and preparing for all kinds of increasingly frequent disasters. Many of these topics provide links to government resources or other well documented historical events as a guide to future predictions.

Despite the myriad of concerns we face with a changing climate, the book does offer hopeful solutions to reducing our carbon footprint that we can do at home, as we shop, as well as encouraging our elected officials.

Drinking-Water Awareness

Being aware of what’s in our water is essential to our health and survival. With that awareness there are many things we can do to improve the water we consume. But what if individuals or large groups of people are not aware that they are consuming contaminated drinking water? Environmental laws are usually enacted to stop some adverse pollution but that does not make it all go away overnight. Some chemicals never go away and are labeled ‘forever chemicals’ or lack scientific data and are classified as ‘emerging contaminants.’

People must take action to help themselves, their family, community, to gain awareness. Cleanliness is next to godliness and fortunately by the grace of God there are people in the world willing to fight for safe water. The Environmental Working Group is a non-profit organization spreading awareness of what’s in our food and water for almost 30 years. To find out what’s in your drinking water and what types of filtration systems can be used to treat the water check out EWG Tapwater.

They also provide an interactive map in the U.S. on hexavalent chromium (Cr +6) contamination popularly known as the ‘Erin Brockovich’ chemical listed as tainting the tap water of 251 million Americans.

You may recall the movie staring Julia Roberts portraying Erin Brockovich in her quest for helping a small California town become aware of Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) contaminating people’s drinking water.

It’s an amazing true story and I have some related personal experiences to share. For about one year I worked as an environmental scientist contractor to PG&E which was about five years after the movie was released. Because of the largest civil lawsuit in history costing PG&E $333 million as well as tremendous damage to their reputation and harm caused to many people, I observed they became very proactive in cleaning up remaining contaminated sites. I did not work on Cr +6 issues related to gas compressor stations but focused on electrical substations and transmission systems in the San Francisco Bay area. I led a team to remove underground pipelines containing transformer cooling oil that potentially contained PCBs. We removed contaminated soil containing arsenic that was used as an insecticide in the mid 1950’s. Power transmission lines built on landfills were subsiding needed urgent repairs. I monitored air quality at a substation construction site next to a school to make sure semi-volatile compounds disposed many decades ago in the soil did not spread.

Check out the recent Brockovich book (which I did at the local library) and found it very informative and relatable on why water supplies get contaminated, how they are affecting peoples health, and what we can do to take action. Here’s an interesting NPR review of the book.

Timber

For the past four months, I frequently drove by this old structure noticing the contrast between the old wood building and new multi-million dollar homes. I wondered about its history: who built it, when it was built, who lived there, and how much longer would it remain standing? One morning I took a walk around the site before construction workers arrived and noticed the large amount of lumber being used for these new homes. But the contrast of the old structure in front of the new homes caught my eye and lens the most. How do we preserve our history while the world is changing so fast? As a newcomer the the area I’m not attached to the history like people who grew up here but am curious about the stories - if only the buildings could speak!

The next day after taking photographs I drove by and was shocked by seeing a bulldozer knocking down the old wood house! Maybe some saw this place as an “eyesore” which might devalue the expensive mansions. Perhaps it would have been a safety hazard. But before it vanished I would have liked to have known more about the history of the area.

One of my previous jobs was to prepare Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments for commercial property. Banks would hire my employer to research, inspect, and complete the report within one week. We needed to review the history of the property and surrounding one-mile radius going back to the first development or at least back to 1940 using air photos, telephone directories, and other documents. We were mostly focused on environmental hazards such as gasoline stations with leaking underground tanks and dry cleaners using PCE chemicals. Most farms had diesel tanks that might cause some local contamination. These hazards could pose a liability for the real estate owners and if we found anything of concern we would recommend collecting samples in a Phase 2 investigation.

Third Year of Community Garden

In July 2019, I posted a blog about a new community garden located in Grand Junction. How have they been able to support the community over three summers impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic? Ann and Walt Trout, who are the directors and primary gardeners of the non-profit known as Two Fishes Farm, have incredible experiences over the past three years and likely have kept many people alive by donating food to the Grand Junction Community Food Bank!

The first year of getting the organic garden started focused on improving the silty soil by adding nutrients and compost as well as developing the irrigation system. Very few people volunteered to help at first due to the new location. Despite the light turnout, the Trout’s persistence demonstrated the potential and provided a decent harvest which prepared the community for the unforeseen pandemic.

Last year with Covid-19 raging, people wanted to get outdoors and the community garden saw a great influx of volunteers. That allowed for more planting, weeding, and harvesting to support many more people. However, increasing seed prices incentivized creating heirloom tomatoes. Instead of buying tomato plants, the farmers save unpatented seeds from the prior year and new plants are grown and pollinated naturally. Other challenges involved finding better solutions for crop irrigation.

Instead of using traditional drip irrigation with a emitter at every plant, the garden adopted a new method this year for irrigation. Flexible fabric hoses connected to main water lines are placed along rows. The fabric hoses have holes at regular intervals of one to four feet allowing for planting at each hole. That eliminates the need for emitters and is buried in the roots but clogging can occur if the water is turbid. Therefore, the main water supply is treated with a sand filter and other chemicals may be needed to remove dissolved solids.

This year the community garden is struggling for volunteers as people are getting out of town. Ann and Walt show up most every day to keep up with the many needs but feel their inspired service making a huge difference to many people. Small grants of about $1,200 have been provided by Western Colorado Community Foundation to support purchasing seeds and weed control fabric.

Just this year so far over 200 pounds of vegetables and eggs have been grown and more than half donated to the food bank! If you would like to support the community garden with your time, labor, or donations please contact Ann Trout at atrout@twofishesfarm.org.

Update August 9, 2021

Ann Trout provided totals of donated vegetables for the three years:

Year 1, 3,400 pounds

Year 2, 6,400 pounds

Year 3, 500 pounds so far this year with an estimate of about 6,000 pounds of vegetables to be donated.

So the total estimate for the three years is 15,800 pounds of vegetables. It is recommended we eat 3 cups of vegetables per day. One pound equals about 1.9 cups so 15,800 pounds equals over 30,000 cups which translates to 10,000 daily servings of vegetables!

Nuclear Plant Community and Contacts

About three months ago we bought a home only three miles away (and 20 miles to Raleigh) from the Harris Nuclear Power Plant. We considered the many tradeoffs with benefits of living in a more rural area near lakes and forests while being mindful of extra unnatural radioactivity in the environment much less the fear of low probability-high consequence risks of a nuclear meltdown. If you saw the recent NETFLIX docudrama on Three Mile Island (TMI), I can understand how scary it might feel wondering if that could ever happen again? The series does reveal the scarcity and importance of honest corporate officials, vigilant regulators, accurate reporters, insider whistleblowers and community organizers.

So far, I feel safe living so close to Harris NPP based on what I know about building, operating, and regulating nuclear power plants. Power plants have improved tremendously over many decades as a direct result of lessons learned from accidents and world events like 9/11. In 2019, I published a series of eight blogs on Mitigating Nuclear Hazards examining my professional experiences with the nuclear fuel cycle including blog number 5 on Reactors.

Finding unbiased sources of information - people, especially experts, who are not pro-nuke or anti-nuke is essential for getting at the realities of safely living by a nuclear power plant. I highly recommend checking out the series of videos by University of Illinois Energy Professor Dr. David Ruzic including the 2021 overview Dispelling the Myths of Nuclear Power and a technical recounting of the history of TMI.

So I’m just beginning to learn specifically about the Duke Energy Progress Harris plant. I discovered that the sign in front of the closed visitors center (“open by appointment only”) provides an outdated phone number because the area code changed from 919 to 984 so the correct number is 984-229-6261. Some websites and customer service representatives still had the old number last time I checked.

So I reached out to the resident inspectors (who live in our community) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to get the correct information. This led to my attending the first tour of the environmental center after the Covid pandemic ended public events. The Harris public affairs specialist is Michelle Burton who can be reached at 984-229-2160. She and Nathan Blanton, a senior scientist for radiation protection, provided an overview of the plant operations to a group of 10 people - mostly with the girl scouts.

I also joined a public meeting held by NRC one month ago on the phone focusing on annual safety inspections of the Harris plant. I was the only member of the public to ask questions on topics including cyber security, evacuation routes, upgrades to equipment, and nuclear waste.

I am hopeful to attend a tour of the plant inside the protected area if it’s offered later this fall. I’ve joined my neighborhood HOA safety committee to be a community organizer seeking and sharing accurate information on topics including the swimming pool, traffic, and the nuclear power plant.

For residents living within a 5-mile radius of the nuclear power plant, the company issues a public alert radio. To obtain the radio, I spoke with Dave Bell (984-229-2229) in the emergency preparedness department at the Harris plant who dropped a Midland weather alert radio off at my house. I found preset channel 7 with a broadcast frequency of 162.550 MHz provides the best reception. Now we’re getting many frequent alerts from the National Weather Service. The Harris plant sends weekly radio tests on Wednesday’s at noon according to the EP Booklet which provides abundant community information including on evacuation routes.

So if you’re in the area perhaps on the way to Harris Lake County Park and driving by the Harris Energy and Environmental Center please let me know if they update the visitors sign with the correct phone number to schedule tours. You may also enjoy the White Oak nature trail with short loops and numerous trees identified. Calling the company public affairs specialist and NRC to request public meetings is another way to show an engaged and informed community.

Coder Dojo

I met the CoderDojo team at the Earth Day celebration in Apex, NC. According to their website:

“CoderDojoApex NC is a volunteer-led digital making and coding club with a mission to inspire children to learn, make and express with technology. We meet every Saturday from 10:30a-12:30pm ET(regular session). We welcome children from ages 7-17 years old and all levels of coding experience from beginner to advanced. Attending a session is free of charge, however signup is necessary. Register on the CoderDojo website to reserve your tickets and become a member of this community.”

Initially my wife and I got excited to learn about the CoderDojoApex group for our son to improve his computer programming skills as well as my sharing the opportunity with kids I meet as a substitute teacher at the public schools. When I heard they are currently creating projects on environmental sustainability I got even more thrilled and they asked me to judge the presentations held last Saturday! Our son is still on a baseball team so we hope he will get involved later this summer.

Group presentations of sustainability projects were judged based on factors created by the organizers for Coolness, Complexity, Presentation, Design and Usability.

Six groups of three or four children presented their projects that they had worked on for over a month. Some groups presented posters, PowerPoint slides, and many wrote Scratch programs. Topics included finding ways to improve growing food at home, sharing information to reduce fossil fuel consumption, protecting wildlife, conserving water, reducing plastic pollution, and preventing forest fires. The winning team programmed soil moisture sensors to water plants using Arduino and they came up with a great title and presentation: “SPLP Sustainable Planting for Lazy People!”

I also liked many of the Scratch games that the students created. The group from Kenya created a game to promote awareness for saving White Rhinos from illegal ivory poaching.

When I see the enthusiasm, concern, creativity, and willingness to sincerely address world problems and create positive outcomes gives me great hope for the future of humanity. For more on the #CoolestProjects Jam event and future events check them out on Facebook!

Watch Out!

Isn’t there a joke about why did the geese (or chicken) cross the road? As I drove the car through a Cary, NC shopping center, our son noticed and photographed this family of Canadian Geese crossing the road. We can assume the chicks were too young to fly strutted in between the parents. Drivers sped by the busy road as the geese tried to find a gap to cross searching for a nearby pond.

This photo reveals the danger that nature faces everyday surviving in the expanding human environment. It also shows how we humans need to be vigilant of nature surrounding us to avoid collisions.

Most parents will do everything they can to protect their children. Even Middle East peace is possible as President Carter negotiated with the leaders of Israel and Egypt by showing photos of their grandchildren while asking what kind of world did they want for their progeny.

So what kind of world do we want for current and future generations? Flourishing in a healthy world abundant with natural resources that sustains all life in balance is the goal of sustainability. The laws of nature strive to continue this balance and people can either realign by becoming defensive drivers in the world environment taking responsibility or acting selfishly wreaking havoc by exploiting nature like road rage maniacs.

Watch Out! With every purchase we make we can ask if this product is sustainably benefiting us and nature. We must reduce our demand on resources like oil, gas, water, food, clothes and more. Conserve and use the minimum necessary or become more efficient in using resources - make it a fun game with your family to get by with just enough. It’s like buying car insurance - we all need it to drive - and the lower risk drivers pay less for their insurance. Prosper — the result of needing and using less, minimizing expenses, and maximizing profits!

Earth Day 2022

Happy Earth Day 2022!

Thanks to the U.S. government agency NOAA for the infographic posted for this very special day. There are so many good ideas represented in this diagram!

We’re so happy when our son can wake up in time to catch the school bus. Two days this week he needed me to drive him the three miles to school and we noticed 100’s of cars doing the same thing. Imagine how much pollution we can save if more kids take school buses more often! Converting to electric or CNG cars and buses will make for better air quality including less carbon emissions.

If you’ve read previous early blogs you may have heard my story but if not here’s a summary of my health/career bio: I was born with asthma so my parents quit smoking cigarettes. Air pollution growing up in D.C. area in the 1960's as well as allergies triggered many severe, almost fatal asthma attacks. There were red alert smog days when we could not go outside. Becoming aware of my sensitive lung issues made me more interested in our environment, learning about weather and earth science in high school, college, and master's program eventually becoming an environmental geologist. I spent my career working on public health issues and for seven years blogging/photographs on global sustainability!

I just posted this bio on the American Lung Association website and found great information:

What's the State of YOUR Air?

For 23 years, the American Lung Association (ALA) has analyzed data from official air quality monitors to compile the State of the Air report. The more you learn about the air you breathe, the more you can protect your health and take steps to make the air cleaner and healthier.

You can make a difference in the air that you breathe.

SIGN OUR PETITION

SHARE YOUR STORY

For the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill area:

  • Tied for 1st for cleanest metropolitan areas in the country for Ozone

  • Ranked 99 for 24-hour particle pollution out of 221 metropolitan areas

  • Ranked 127 for annual particle pollution out of 202 metropolitan areas

Check out the air quality for where you live and see how the air has improved since issuing the Clean Air Act in 1970 but there is still work to do according to ALA:

The “State of the Air” 2022 report finds that despite decades of progress on cleaning up sources of air pollution, more than 40% of Americans—over 137 million people—are living in places with failing grades for unhealthy levels of particle pollution or ozone. This is 2.1 million more people breathing unhealthy air compared to last year’s report. Nearly 9 million more people were impacted by daily spikes in deadly particle pollution than reported last year. In the three years covered by this report, Americans experienced more days of “very unhealthy” and “hazardous” air quality than ever before in the two-decade history of “State of the Air."

Western U.S. wildfires burning more frequently and intensely are increasing due to climate change which is the main reason for the increasing air pollution. We all need to do more to celebrate this beautiful Earth every Day as well as give back and find ways to make a difference to improve all life.

Celebrating Yellowstone!

Happy 150th Birthday Yellowstone National Park! The central Wyoming hot spot, home to Old Faithful and Yellowstone Falls (shown in my photo from September 2019), was the first designated location for an American National Park.

Yellowstone was one of the first national parks that my parents and I visited when I was just 17 years old. We drove from our home in northern Virginia across America to see many national parks and other beautiful places. Luckily, I had just gotten my driver’s license so I enjoyed the trip much more by being behind the wheel about half of the trip.

Seeing Yellowstone’s incredible geology, ecology, and wildlife - as close to nature as I had ever been - motivated me to want to learn about the natural sciences. I vividly recall getting very close to a moose in Yellowstone next to a wetland but my Kodak Instamatic camera made the animal look far away.

I read a book on Geology of the National Parks that served as the foundation for my studying geology at Guilford College in North Carolina and in graduate school at the University of Wyoming.

I’ve been back to Yellowstone many times. One time during winter, I stayed with a friend at a West Yellowstone cabin and we cross country skied into the park. The fresh snow covered a harder icy layer so conditions were great for making new tracks. We skied into the park about 10 miles on a closed road. Unexpectedly, on the way back we noticed animal tracks following our ski marks - big prints made from a bear! Seemed unusual to have a bear coming out of hibernation so we imagined how good we must smell to a hungry bear which motivated us to return with alacrity!

Taking my wife and young son to Yellowstone in 2019 fulfilled a dream of mine to share my wonder for park. We could hear reintroduced wolf calls and see his excitement for huge bison herds.

I’m so grateful to our ancestors including Hayden, Grant and others to create and protect Yellowstone and many other national parks. Ken Burns aptly stated that National Parks are “America’s Best Idea.”

Sustainable Fishing

The Wake County (North Carolina) Public School System’s sixth grade science classes are reading World Without Fish by Mark Kurlansky. Published in 2011, the author states that on the current trend most fish we know of could be gone in 50 years! Even worse, since all life is interconnected, including on land and in oceans, loss of fish populations will affect other wildlife like birds as well as threaten the food web and human existence.

Environmental stresses such as climate change and pollution and fishing fleets using drag nets to meet consumer demand are leading causes for species depletions and extinctions. Biodiversity is the key to success for all life which would be threatened if fish species decline. For example, overfishing bluefin tuna would harm dolphins and cause other species like jellyfish to expand. Seabirds that eat fish would also die out causing problems on land. Reptiles would not have food that is discarded by sea birds.

It’s interesting to read how many scientists in the late 1800’s thought fish populations could not diminish due to abundant egg production and fisherman would never intentionally impact fish populations. They misused Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” by not considering new inventions like the steam engine and monofilament plastic nets that allowed for deeper bottom fishing. People mistakenly thought fish in the deep oceans were as abundant as along coastal waters.

Humpback whales and herring eat krill - shrimp-like creatures which eat microscopic phytoplankton. White meat fish include cod, haddock, flounder, and halibut can swim near the bottom of the ocean and swim to the surface to eat smaller fish and shell fish. These fish are prized in commercial markets. Middle ocean depth fish include sardines, anchovies, herring, mackerel, and tuna have darker flesh and contain oily fluids.

Mr. Kurlansky aptly points out the sad story of the Orange Roughy that only 50 years ago became too popular and within a decade diminished by 90% in Australia due to a lack of scientific understanding. These red fish are found at depths of 5000 feet and turn orange when they die. They can live for 150 years but do not begin reproducing until age 20 so catching juvenile fish harmed the entire population.

Fish farms may not be the answer for sustainable fishing due to related problems. Ships the size of factories net and grind up fish for feeding farmed fish. The book shares that four pounds of fish meal are needed for one pound of farmed salmon. Farmed fish confined to small overcrowded areas develop weaker muscle tissue as well as increase water pollution.

The best solutions for sustainable fishing are for consumers to buy fish labeled as “certified sustainable seafood.” Higher prices to fisherman are going for line-caught fish like white albacore tuna and we can avoid buying other fish higher on the food chain such as bluefin tuna and shark. Lower food chain fish are more abundant and sustainable including sardines, anchovies, and herring. Other suggested actions include becoming active in environmental groups and promoting international relations to change consumer demand.

Sustainable Blogging

Today’s the last day of February 2022. I last posted a blog just after the New Year. Since starting the Conserve-Prosper website in May of 2015, I’ve consistently posted at least one blog every month for 80 months. So now I have just a few hours left today to add a blog for this month.

During the month of June 2019, I challenged myself to post a blog every day of the month. Typically writing a blog and finding the relevant photograph could take up to four hours to complete.

It’s been a great privilege to express my First Amendment freedom of speech, particularly in the last few years after retiring from the federal government. We see dictatorships that prevent free speech but does your employer (teacher, spouse, parent or child) block you’re expressing diverse points of view? Perhaps it’s ironic that I am borrowing the “Blogging” photo from a .gov website!

With the crisis in Ukraine, I feel shock, dismay, helplessness and confusion. It brings back memories from 43 years ago as a college student spending a semester in Germany when we visited East and West Berlin before the fall of the Soviet Union. After a week in West Berlin, we passed through the Wall at CheckPoint Charlie and spent three days in the communist country. There were many Russian tourists that we could not meet but our tour guide shared his misery living in East Germany and he desperately wanted to escape to America. The dictatorship government claimed they wanted to prevent western ideas from contaminating the minds of their people. I heard during this time Putin was stationed with KGB nearby in Dresden.

The most amazing memory was on a Saturday evening at 9 pm we walked out near the Wall and could see West Berlin from the Eastern side. The nightclubs blasted disco music and neon lights lit up the sky. In stark contrast, the East Berlin side was dark and quiet with a curfew at 10 pm. It seemed to me that East and West Berlin were at two extreme ends of the spectrum before the Wall came crashing down ten years later.

The fight in Ukraine between a democratic system and crazy Putin’s dictatorship is all about freedom of individual rights such as free speech!

So pray there is a peaceful resolution to this and many other crises. Everyone needs to find a way to express themselves and force free speech around the world. I consider each blog like a message in a bottle hoping some will be read and make a difference in the world. Writing these blogs has made a difference in my life so thanks to everyone who takes the time to check it out and feel free to post a comment.

Charge It!

Filling our PHEV battery at a public facility requires three things to charge it: the charging station, a “smart” phone, and a credit card. For the past week I’ve attempted to find several public charging stations to learn the process: some EV stations were broken, some cost more than gasoline, and some locations are free! The difference depends upon the location owner who purchases and maintains the charging station.

The first charging station we discovered, located in front of our apartment office and the largest across the United States and Europe, is made by ChargePoint Holdings, Inc:. -chargepoin+. I downloaded the app on my iPhone which provides map locations and used my credit card to maintain a balance of $10. They make and distribute hardware and software but did not claim responsibility for setting up and operating the station when I called their customer service to seek help. They said our apartment location was not listed on their network and had not been properly installed. Strike one.

They sent me to the nearby Whole Foods that claims to offers a free charge but it was also not working. When I called again to ChargePoint customer service, a different agent told me it’s been broken for many days. Turns out the plug-in charger locking mechanism had been broken on both outlets and has not been repaired in at least a week. Maybe sabotage? Strike two on public charging!

The next day on Saturday searching for another free charging location the ChargePoint app directed me five miles away to an empty office parking lot at the MetLife building located at 1000 Weston Parkway in Cary, NC. Using my iPhone to unlock the cable charger for the first time it worked - A single! We took a family walk around Lake CrabTree reservoir on a chilly day so we only stayed about 30 minutes and added 1.62 kwh, an estimated four miles to the battery. Then we found the West Regional Library provides a free charge manufactured by EATON that recharged faster than the last place with a full charge taking 4.5 hours.

The first EV charging station requiring us to pay money was in downtown Raleigh in front of the Museum of Natural Sciences which is free to visit. However, street parking costs $2 for a maximum of two hours. For the ChargePoint charger I paid $1.75 to get an estimated 14 miles of charge which works out to $0.125 per mile which is more than the cost of gasoline that costs about $0.08 per mile.

The next day I returned to our apartment and asked the manager about operating the charger. She said some people have been able to use it but they did not know how it worked. After a few attempts I discovered that by repeating the process to unlock the charger three times with my iPhone finally opened up the power cable and since it is not installed to the ChargePoint network there is no cost for using the charger. A home run!

We also just began to rent a one-car garage that has an electrical outlet so we can use the 110v cable to get a full charge in about 12 hours. This process of looking for charging stations has made me feel like a e-vampire searching for a free energy connection!

Does charging the lithium-ion battery affect it’s lifetime? According to driving electric:

“1. Don’t overcharge it: constantly topping up your electric car to keep it fully charged can actually damage it. Laptops, for example, lose battery capacity if they're plugged in all the time. It's better to let the capacity run down to 10 or 20%, then recharge to around 80%.

2. While electric-car batteries have a built-in thermal management system to keep them cool, it’s still worth seeking out a shady spot on a hot day, or even a garage or car port if you plan to charge at home.

3. It’s also advisable to avoid immediately charging your electric car following a particularly spirited drive. Give the batteries a chance to cool down first . Limit your use of rapid chargers. Obviously, there are times when you need a top up in a hurry, and the fact they can give you a quick boost of up to 80% in a short space of time will be invaluable to higher-mileage drivers. But don’t rely solely on rapids to keep your car topped up, as they’re not good for the batteries in the long run. Slow charge whenever you can and especially if it's cold outside.

5. Don't park your car uncovered for long periods of time in very hot conditions.”

Combining my experience with these recommendations indicates that EVs are most suitable for people who can charge their cars in their home garage overnight.

Driving Across the USA in our PHEV

This year we purchased and enjoyed driving across the United States, from Los Angeles to North Carolina, in our plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Our experiences are teaching us about making the energy-efficient transition from gas to electric motors and this blog is not a plug for any particular brand.

Almost six years ago I described our positive experience purchasing a 2016 Toyota Rav4 hybrid. We sold that car after five years to travel to Thailand one year ago. Over there we attended the 42nd Bangkok International Motor Show entitled “Shaping the Next Chapter” to compare several PHEVs. All the major brands were represented including new models by Audi, BMW, Ford, Hyundai, Kia, MG, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Toyota, and Volvo allowing us to sit inside many cars all in one location. We also watched many videos of people test driving the new vehicles. In the end, we chose our most familiar brand hoping to make the sixth purchase of a Toyota vehicle. The challenge was being able to find the new Rav4 Prime with only about 3,600 vehicles projected to be made during the pandemic due to supply-chain battery and chip shortages. In July 2021, we found several dealers in Los Angeles had one or two Primes available per week with more customers than cars. Our dealer in Grand Junction, Western Slope Toyota, said they only had one Prime for the entire year and sold it quickly! We found out later that it was a friend of ours who bought that vehicle.

We ruminated over taking the risk to fly to LA and look to buy our dream car compared to going home to Colorado first. We took the gamble and within a few days in LA found that Carson Toyota provided the best deal in LA. Our credit union website facilitated our search and selection by making online offers for vehicles in advance of arriving at the dealer. However, the dealers charged an extra premium for the low inventory and for the first time we paid above the manufacturers suggested retail price MSRP.

Another decision we needed to make was choosing between two trim levels: SE and XSE. We chose the better package mostly for the SofTex® instead of fabric seating. According to Toyota, “SofTex® is a synthetic leather seat material designed for wear, easy cleaning and resisting spills. Soft to the touch, SofTex weighs about half as much as genuine leather. The way it's made generates around 85% fewer CO2 emissions and 99% fewer Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) than conventional synthetic leather.”

The Toyota Rav4 Prime mid-sized SUV features a 2.5 liter, 4 cylinder gasoline engine rated at 40 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway. The better fuel efficiency around town is a function of the hybrid battery capturing energy from the braking system. The 2021 hybrid improves efficiency over the 2016 Rav4 Hybrid which got 34 mpg city and 31 mpg on the highway.

Front and rear electric traction motors are linked to the powertrain hybrid system providing 42 miles of range from its 18.1-kwh lithium ion battery pack. The electric fuel efficiency is rated at 94 MPGe which is quantified by EPA in kilowatt-hours (kWH) per 100 miles. This is unit of volume per unit of distance, which is exactly the opposite of MPG. Basically, with kWh/100mi, lower numbers are better; with MPG, higher numbers are better. According to the EPA, burning one gallon of gas produces 115,000 BTUs (British thermal units). To generate the same amount of heat by way of electricity, it takes 33.7 kWh. Kilowatt-hours is the standard energy unit for electricity. In simplified terms, if an electric vehicle can travel 100 miles on 33.7 kWh of electricity, the EPA rates it at 100 MPGe. As you can see, this would be a very efficient vehicle, because a gas car would have to travel 100 miles per gallon to be equivalent.

Driving our new Prime off the lot in Carson, CA we caught the interstate and noticed the electric charge running out quickly in EV mode so we switched to HV gas mode. The EV is more efficient to use in town and the HV mode on the highway. Our trip along I10 to I15 took us from a morning of coastal rain into the rain shadow Mohave Desert with July temperatures rapidly increasing from 60 degrees at the coast to over 100 degrees F by the time we reached Barstow. We spent overnight at Lake Las Vegas meeting my brother and his wife for an enjoyable dinner. However, we did not find a charging station at the hotel and continued the next day running mostly on gasoline.

Employing the full-speed range dynamic radar cruise control (DRCC) became the biggest surprise of the trip. Before setting the cruise control I noticed a slight grab by the steering wheel to stay in my lane and when changing lanes only by using my turn signal would the steering wheel release the tension. When setting the cruise control on the interstate, the steering wheel takes over using the radar system to by guided by the traffic lines. This worked okay on straight roads but I did not trust the car to let go of the steering wheel and it seemed to weave left and right as if I was intoxicated. I also noticed cross winds made going straight more challenging. The DRCC slows the car down when getting close to a vehicle in front and I needed to anticipate sooner then normal to go around slower vehicles. Guess I still like to feel in control of the driving and using technology to supplement but not automate my driving experience.

We stayed in Grand Junction from July until November running primarily on EV mode. We could plug-in to the 110v outlet in our garage and full recharge took about 12 hours. We ran the gas engine once per week to keep the fluids moving and after four months only consumed about a half a tank or 5.5 gallons of gasoline. It seemed amazing that we could drive all around town and very rarely need to go more than 42 miles on one change. Luckily, the battery range improved over time and we noticed an improvement up to about 50 miles on one charge.

We got our first free service check at four months. We only put on about 2,500 miles and service is recommended before 4,000 miles or at four months. I asked about gasoline degrading after time and they suggested a BP fuel additive to clean the engine every 10,000 miles. I asked about the ability to recharge the electric battery using the gas engine but the mechanic was not aware of this feature.

Driving on our move from Grand Junction to the east coast, my wife discovered that by holding down the EV/HV button for five seconds allows the gas engine to recharge the electric battery up to about 80% or 32 miles. Using the extra energy stored in the battery helped when getting off the freeways and avoid idling at traffic lights. We still averaged 36 mpg for our trip so perhaps recharging the battery with the gasoline engine does not improve fuel efficiency overall. I still have more to learn and in the next blog will share our experience now that we are staying in an apartment with commercial plug-in charging stations.

In preparing this blog, I learned that Toyota in the second half of this year greatly accelerated supply for the Rav4 Prime and delivered about 20,000 vehicles to the marketplace overall this year. That should help reduce costs at the dealer and offer consumers more choices.

An Inconvenient COPout?

The United Nations Climate Change Conference just concluded in Glasgow, Scotland after two weeks of political rhetoric with backtracking delay tactics rather than achieving substantive changes right now! Reuters provided the play-by-play to complete the diluted agreement.

To have any hope of Peace on Earth, the world needs an immediate drastic change in course, what I call a sea-change transformation and America can and is obligated to lead the way! The Economist shows how bad disasters could be with the current trajectory of carbon emissions causing our Earth to warm by 3 degrees Celsius.

For 26 years, the UN Conference of the Parties (COP) have been meeting annually to attempt to solve the climate crisis. By the way, discussions to phase out chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) preventing further damage to the protective ozone layer only took about a decade according to C2ES.

At COP26, many world leaders and statesmen like Sir Richard Attenborough verbally and visually demonstrated the imminent climate catastrophe. At the beginning of this week, former President Barack Obama gave a passionate speech lasting about 45 minutes to share successes and shortcomings on the fight for clean green energy encouraging young activists to stay angry and keep fighting. What he and most everyone attending the conference left out is a COPout!

The United States of America is the world’s largest cumulative contributor to greenhouse gases adding 20% of the world’s carbon pollution into the atmosphere according to CarbonBrief. So we Americans are the most responsible for fixing the problem and openly discuss all solutions, right?

Some are blaming President Biden for not wanting to raise taxes on people making less than $400,000 which would prevent creating a carbon tax while President Biden rightly blamed his predecessor for moving out of the Paris agreement reached five years ago that proposed to limit future temperature increases to 1.5 deg. C.

In the summer of 2008, when Democratic nominee Obama came campaigning to Las Vegas where I lived and worked for the feds dealing with nuclear waste, we saw him make a deal with Senator Harry Reid. Top on Reid’s list was ending the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository project to be located on the atomic bomb testing grounds at the Nevada Test Site. I discussed the world’s nuclear waste issue and my experiences in this 2019 blog. The key to solving climate change requires conservation and new innovations in all power generation including nuclear fission and fusion. Here are some current breakthroughs by government-industry and MIT.

About 20% of the world’s power currently comes from nuclear energy but only one country, Finland, is building a repository to solve the nuclear waste problem.

The American Nuclear Society expressed concern of being silenced before the COP26 conference and issued a statement at the opening: “we urge the delegates to assume that a significant commercial deployment of new reactor designs and advanced nuclear fuel will occur in the 2030 timeframe and to acknowledge that such a scale-up will require a significant investment in research and development funding for advanced nuclear technologies.”

Time Magazine reports that nuclear is COP26’s quiet controversy with some side agreements being arranged but certainly is not in the mainstream conversation.

The U.S. and other huge carbon emitting countries are reluctant to pay for damages to developing countries. This is contrary to standard laws like Superfund where the polluter pays. Meanwhile, developing countries like India proposed becoming net zero by 2070 which is at least 20 years too late as well as weaken language in the final agreement to “phase down” instead of “phase out” coal. Other coal and hydrocarbon-rich countries including Australia, China, Russia and Saudi Arabia worked hard to weaken agreements. No agreement was reached to stop drilling for more oil.

All the delays in taking action are not just An Inconvenient Truth but an Inconvenient COP-out!

Did Smokey the Bear Get the Axe?

The United States Forest Service (USFS) 77-year old campaign using Smokey the Bear effectively prevented many smaller wildfires but some believe may have contributed to enabling catastrophic wildfires like at Yellowstone National Park in 1988. It was the nation’s largest wildfire at the time burning 36% of the park, close to 800,000 acres. Ecologist changed their view that suppressing wildfires caused by lightning or humans actually caused more damage when the larger forest burned uncontrollably. However, another cause of the inferno was the unexpected dry conditions in July which dried out the “fuel” and allowed wildfires to spread rapidly.

Many people are blaming the Smokey Bear campaign as the cause of more recent larger wildfires as reported by NPR in 2012 and the Washington Post in 2018. The first article states, “Many fire experts embrace controlled, or "prescribed," fires — purposely set fires that do the cleanup job that small natural fires once did. It takes the tinder out of the tinder box. But people have built homes and towns close to forests; they don't like the smoke, and prescribed burns sometimes get out of control. The Cerro Grande Fire in New Mexico in 2000 was a controlled fire — until it jumped fire lines and destroyed hundreds of homes.”

Raise your hand (or comment below) if you think maybe there are other factors involved to creating massive wildfires? If the USFS’s Smokey the Bear advertisements had not reminded boy scouts to put out campfires would those small fires have been similar to prescribed burns? So what’s going on?

According the the Congressional Research Service published this month, “Since 2000, an annual average of 70,600 wildfires has burned an annual average of 7.0 million acres. This figure is more than double the average annual acreage burned in the 1990s (3.3 million acres), although a greater number of fires occurred annually in the 1990s (78,600 average).”

Obviously, climate change is making for more severe weather conditions including prolonged droughts enabling wildfires especially in the western U.S. According the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions: “Climate change enhances the drying of organic matter in forests (the material that burns and spreads wildfire), and has doubled the number of large fires between 1984 and 2015 in the western United States.”

For some interesting science asking if prescribed fires can help forests survive droughts, check out this 2017 USGS webinar as part of the Climate Change Science and Management. They correlate death of forests due to droughts and beetle-kill infestations which are both getting worse with climate change. Prescribed burns are not very effective due to a variety of reasons and we must consider if the long term costs to the health of the environment and people exceed the uncertain short-term benefits.

What is needed is a holistic, comprehensive understanding of human activities impacting the Earth such as carbon greenhouse gas emissions affecting climate change. Forest fires only worsens the climate crisis and we need to plant more trees rather than destroy them. Research budgets at USGS and other local-state-federal agencies and research institutions investigating climate change need to be increased and not cut (as was done in the previous administration).

Specific to the Santa Fe, New Mexico USFS, I provided comments in 2019 on the scoping document and again last week on the draft Environmental Assessment. The USFS is increasing their prescribed fires nationwide in reaction to the numerous California wildfires making many people and wildlife ill. Prescribed burns in Santa Fe are ongoing - see NM Fire Info: “Smoke-sensitive individuals and people with respiratory problems or heart disease are encouraged to take precautionary measures.”

Here are my recent comments to the USFS draft EA to expand prescribed burns::

The Santa Fe Mountains Landscape Resiliency Project #55088 is unacceptable as described in the current draft EA. I have lived in that area and enjoyed hiking on USFS managed land. Myself and many friends/residents have asthma and other health concerns that require clean air, minimal not increased burning, and notifications prior to prescribed burns. How will information on burning schedules be communicated and in what languages - including to the local native Americans, Hispanics, and Anglo citizens? The federal government should consider people at risk of health impacts from prescribed burns and offer mitigation such as HEPA air filters.

A full EIS is needed to provide adequate public awareness and evaluate this major federal action. The final PEIS National Forest System Land Management Planning dated 2012 is out of date to support the draft EA for Santa Fe and many other parts of the US where similar measures are being proposed. The USFS has not provided adequate cost-benefit analyses with alternatives that include impacts to climate change, increases in carbon emissions from prescribed burns, use of herbicides, degraded water quality due to the prescribed burns from chemicals, erosion, and more impacts.

It is unreasonable to compare potential future wildfires as the motivation for prescribed burns when there have already been many wildfires in the Santa Fe National Forest. Drought conditions will only worsen with increasing climate change making the forest vulnerable to future fires even after prescribed burns reduce the "fuel." Given the importance of this decision on the region, more updated scientific consideration is needed through the EIS process.

While it appears Smokey the Bear slogan is getting “the axe,” I think the campaign should expand to say “Only You Can Stop Polluting.” We all need to change our habits and see our role impacting the planet! Every day we can drive vehicles less, walk or bike more, reduce power consumption, buy less, find substitutes for plastics, and many more positive actions. By reducing pollution, including carbon, we can all reverse course on climate change and other destructive impacts. We need to courageously change as individuals and as countries, confronting our addictions to petroleum and coal. Perhaps this week at the COP26 Climate talks in Glasgow there will be a “sea change.” For more ideas, see my previous blog posts with many supporting books and website references and can look for specifics with a search on home page.

Brilliance

On the cover photo, Poppy brilliantly captures her selfie with sunlight diffusing through a North Carolina forest that preciously lasted just for a few seconds.

In the past three months, my family and I have traveled from the tropical urban paradise of Bangkok, Thailand, back to our previous home in the harsh, drought stricken Western Colorado, and to the lush pine and oak forests of North Carolina for fall break. Check out my gallery for some of our favorite photographs.

In Bangkok, I felt very connected to Nature by taking morning walks in our suburban neighborhood filled with sweet-smelling flowering trees and shrubs, listening to ubiquitous bird calls, and feeling soaked by intense humidity.

In Grand Junction, Colorado, we’ve transitioned from summer to fall, from wildfire smoke plaguing the western United States and dryness that makes our eyes and noses gritty, and on to cooler temperatures with morning frosts. Currently, the skies are clear but as winter approaches we will soon see inversions of cold air in the valley that traps air pollution and warmer temperatures in the mountains making for healthy skiing. The cottonwood forests along the Colorado River and aspens in the mountains are turning brilliant shades of dark to light yellow.

In North Carolina, we immediately felt awestruck by the tall thin pine trees around the Raleigh-Durham International airport. These immature forests spaced closely together tower over roadways. The clever capitol city designers of past decades laid out a wonderful mix of greenspace, residential, commercial, industrial and educational institutions including the famous Research Triangle Park. We enjoyed bike riding through the pine forests and parks with lakes around Cary-Apex as well as hiking with friends at Cascades Preserve. The boost of oxygen in the forests refreshes the body and spirit.

Visiting the Guilford College campus in Greensboro as an alumnus for the first time in 21 years since attending a reunion, I immediately recalled the amazing smell of oak trees that dominate the interior quadrangular landscape. We saw gray squirrels busily collecting acorns and environmental sustainability students harvesting beautiful Kentucky rainbow corn. The Guilford Woods contain 240 acres of old growth forest where the Quakers, who founded the College in 1837, hid slaves in the “underground railroad” as well as contentious objectors against fighting previous wars.

We also traveled to western North Carolina to see Asheville and other towns along the Blue Ridge parkway. The mountain winterberry and maple trees were just being to change colors to yellow and red.

Visiting three diverse environments brought home to us the beauty and essential need for healthy forests! In the next blog, I plan to discuss national forest management and combatting wildfires.

Conserving Food

Food conservation to ensure adequate supplies and prevent starvation is always critical, especially during natural disasters, pandemics and wars. Over the past couple of years we’ve all seen food shortages and inflated prices. The current natural gas and fertilizer shortage in the United Kingdom may soon lead to food shortages according to CNN. Conservation of existing supplies is often the easiest and most cost-effective remedy but seems to go against human nature to hoard and drive up prices.

I have known and blogged about my parents/grandparents generations of Great Depression-World War II and us growing up to conserve resources. Here is a blog I wrote on Memorial Day 2016:

“My Mom shared memories as I was growing up of the War Rationing Program to conserve all resources. Each family received a coupon book to purchase food, clothing, shoes, gasoline, and much more. The government wanted everyone to ration goods to help the soldiers and created messages like, "Do with less so they'll have enough.”

However, I am just now learning about the food conservation programs from seventh grade classes in America which are learning about World War I. According to Smithsonian’s American History: a visual encyclopedia:

“The Food Administration was headed by engineer Herbert Hoover. Aided by a massive advertising campaign, Hoover encouraged Americans to observe meatless Tuesdays, wheatless Mondays and Wednesdays, and porkless Thursdays and Saturdays. Posters with slogans like “Use All Leftovers” and “Be a Member of the Clean-Plate Club” also helped.”

According to the National Archives which provided the source of the cover poster:

Sow the Seeds of Victory! Posters from the Food Administration During World War I

Background

Even in peaceful times Americans frequently debate fundamental questions about government: What should the federal government do? What does the Constitution sanction? What does it prohibit? What is the relationship between governmental action and volunteerism? During wars, declared or not, Americans argue even more fervently as they often witness government undertaking different and more numerous roles than it undertakes during peacetime.

From the outbreak of World War I in Europe until the signing of the Versailles Treaty, the Wilson administration proposed and implemented an extraordinary number of programs that affected the lives of Americans in their everyday activities. Even the Progressives, who tended to favor more state and federal responsibility, must have been dazed at the expansion of government action beyond the conventional arenas of public policy.

The Lever Act of 1917 represents both the normal working of American government and the extraordinary circumstances of World War I. The process of creating the Lever Act certainly followed the "legislative dance" outlined in the Constitution and congressional custom. Entries in the indexes to the New York Times for 1917 testify to the accepted but various interests of members of Congress in supporting or opposing the legislation; other entries show the range of lobbyists interested in supporting or opposing the bill. In this, the legislative dance seemed typically American: proposed legislation, support or opposition from special interest groups, legislative revision, and congressional hearings. In August 1917, the dance ended. Congress passed the Food and Fuel Control Act (40 Stat. 276), also known as the Lever Act.

Passage of the bill did not immediately impact the American public. Like any federal legislation, the Food and Fuel Control Act faced the next normal step: implementation, the stage of policy- making between the establishment of a policy and the consequences of the policy for the people it affects. With the authority and power granted to him by Congress in the legislation, on August 10, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson issued Executive Order 2679-A creating the U. S. Food Administration. In doing so, he created a government entity to replace an existing volunteer organization. The U. S. Food Administration, operating in each state, was to

  1. Assure the supply, distribution, and conservation of food during the war,

  2. Facilitate transportation of food and prevent monopolies and hoarding, and

  3. Maintain governmental power over foods by using voluntary agreements and a licensing system.

Using the same authority, Wilson created two subsidiaries, the U. S. Grain Corporation and the U. S. Sugar Equalization Board. Together these bodies would extraordinarily impact American lives.

Herbert Hoover, former head of the Belgian Relief Organization, lobbied for and won the job of administrator of the Food Administration. Hoover had made clear to President Wilson that a single, authoritative administrator should head the effort, not a board. This, he believed, would ensure an effective federal organization. He further insisted that he accept no salary. Taking no pay, he argued, would give him the moral authority he needed to ask the American people to sacrifice to support the war effort. As he later wrote in his memoirs, his job was to ask people to "Go back to simple food, simple clothes, simple pleasures. Pray hard, work hard, sleep hard and play hard. Do it all courageously and cheerfully."

As head of the U. S. Food Administration, Hoover, given the authority by Wilson, became a "food dictator." The Lever Act had given the president power to regulate the distribution, export, import, purchase, and storage of food. Wilson passed that power on to Hoover. To succeed, Hoover designed an effort that would appeal to the American sense of volunteerism and avoid coercion. In designing the program, he adopted a federal approach, combining centralized power and decentralized power. He oversaw federal corporations and national trade associations; he sought cooperation of local buyers and sellers. Through it all he called for patriotism and sacrifices that would increase production and decrease food consumption. "Food," Hoover and the administration proclaimed, "will win the war."

"No aspect of the people's lives remained unchanged," wrote one historian in assessing the effect of this board and its companions, the War Industries Board and the Fuel Administration. Under Hoover's direction, the Food Administration, in league with the Council of Defense, urged all homeowners to sign pledge cards that testified to their efforts to conserve food. The government boards issued the appeal on a Friday. By the following week, Americans had embraced wheatless Mondays, meatless Tuesdays, porkless Saturdays. According to a sesquicentennial article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, in Wisconsin's Green Lake County 100 percent of the housewives signed on and 80 percent of Milwaukee did. Schoolchildren joined housewives in supporting the effort by signing this pledge: "At table I'll not leave a scrap of food upon my plate. And I'll not eat between meals But for supper time I'll wait." In support of the war effort, Americans discovered nouveau menus filled with dogfish, sugarless candy, whale meat, and horse steaks. They planted victory gardens and prized leftovers. Even President Wilson cooperated, grazing sheep on the White House lawns. The emphasis on voluntary support worked.

While Hoover preferred the emphasis on the "spirit of self sacrifice," he also had authority to coerce. He set wheat prices, bought and distributed wheat. Coercion plus volunteerism produced results. By 1918 the United States was exporting three times as much breadstuffs, meat, and sugar as it had prior to the war.

To achieve the results, the Food Administration combined an emphasis on patriotism with the lure of advertising created by its own Advertising Section. This section produced a wealth of posters for both outdoor and indoor display. One proclaimed: "Food is Ammunition-Don't waste it." Another featured a woman clothed in stars and stripes reaching out to embrace the message: "Be Patriotic sign your country's pledge to save the food." A third combined patriotism with a modern healthy diet message. At the top, the poster encouraged readers to: "Eat more corn, oats and rye products-fish and poultry-fruits, vegetables and potatoes, baked, boiled and broiled foods." At the bottom, the poster concluded "Eat less wheat, meat, sugar and fats to save for the army and our allies." All of these posters, now part of Record Group 4, the Records of the U. S. Food Administration, testify to the intent of the government to mobilize the food effort during World War I. As much as possible, it did so under a banner of volunteerism, rather than coercion. In doing so, the Wilson administration created a program that did affect the everyday lives of Americans during World War I.